a✳Art Across
Eras.
EN中文
EXPLORE / MAKERS

Frederick Sandys

1829–1904

THE PERSON AND THEIR WORLD

Life and career

Sandys developed as a British painter and draughtsman and became closely associated with Pre-Raphaelite circles. Portraits, literary figures and highly worked drawings occupy important places in his career. His later reputation rests partly on the intensity of individual heads, but the surviving range also includes observed age and mythological narrative.

Museum biography (English)

Frederick Sandys received his initial training from his father, a minor Norwich artist. Encouraged by Rev. James Bulwer (1820-1899), a pupil and patron of John Sell Cotman (1782-1842), he attended the Norwich School of Design from 1846. When he arrived in London five years later, he was already a skilled illustrator. Through a family connection, Sandys was introduced to George Richmond (1809-1896), one of the century's most accomplished portraitists. From Richmond he acquired the skills and taste for life-size chalk portraits. Portraiture would remain his principal means of support for the rest of his career, although for a brief period in the 1860s he practiced oil painting and designed what were arguably many of the finest book illustrations of the Victorian era, including his celebrated illustration to Christina Rossetti's poem Amor Mundi (1865). In 1857 John Everett Millais (1829-1896) had exhibited at the Royal Academy a troubadour painting, Sir Isumbras at the Ford (Lady Lever Art Gallery, Port Sunlight), of which Sandys produced a brilliant engraved parody, substituting for the figures in the picture caricatures of the founding members of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood-Millais, Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1828-1882), and Hunt (q.v.)-and a braying ass, identified as John Ruskin, for Sir Isumbras's charger. This had the unexpected result of solidifying Sandys's friendship with Rossetti, with whom he later resided in Chelsea in 1866-67. Under Rossetti's influence Sandys painted his most important subject picture, Medea (Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery), which was exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1869. During that year Rossetti accused Sandys of plagiarism, thus precipitating a permanent breach in their relationship. Sandys soon after abandoned oil painting to concentrate on chalk portraits and drawings of idealized female figures, the choicest of which were derived from the features of his common-law wife, Mary Jones. Rossetti is generally credited with directing Sandys toward such Aestheticism, but Leighton's (q.v.) resplendent series of pseudonymous portraits of his model Nanna Risi, exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1858-59, offered an equally inspiring precedent devoid of the symbolic mysticism of Rossetti's femmes fatales.1 1. See, for example, the pictures titled Pavonia reproduced in Stephen Jones et al., Frederick Leighton, exh. cat., London, Royal Academy of Arts (1996), 112-13. In both pictures the exquisitely painted head and shoulders of the sitters are set against backdrops of decorative vegetation and peacock tail-feathers. Sandys resorted to this format repeatedly in his works of the late 1860s and 1870s.

Creator biography · The Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0

Works across a career

Selected examples, not a complete catalogue. Read date ranges and attributions before inferring a career sequence.

  1. 01

    1862

    1862

    Susanna Anderson Rose

    Material / technique
    oil on wood
    Attribution / role
    Museum attribution
    Collection / source
    The Cleveland Museum of Art
    Mr. and Mrs. William H. Marlatt Fund · Image: public domain (CC0)
    Museum catalogue note

    This keenly perceptive portrait of Susanna Anderson Rose (1795–1870) was painted when the sitter was 67 years old. The fine network of lines on her face are meticulously observed as are her silver gray curls and pale blue eyes. Frederick Sandys’s ability to render detail is evident in the subject’s bonnet, elaborately trimmed with lace and azure ribbon, and the texture of her brown fur cloak.

    Collection text · The Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0
  2. 02

    1866–1868

    View this work at the source

    Reference entry · image not reproduced

    1866–1868

    Medea

    Material / technique
    Oil on composite wood with gold leaf
    Attribution / role
    Museum attribution
    Collection / source
    Birmingham Museums; Nevada Museum of Art exhibition checklist
  3. 03

    1871

    1871

    The Coral Necklace

    Material / technique
    black, brown, and red chalk
    Attribution / role
    Museum attribution
    Collection / source
    The Cleveland Museum of Art
    Leonard C. Hanna Jr. Fund · Image: public domain (CC0)
    Museum catalogue note

    Closely associated with the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, Frederick Sandys was a friend of Dante Gabriel Rossetti and played an active role in the bohemian artistic, literary, and theatrical circles of the day in London. This is a portrait of Mary Emma Jones, the artist’s favorite model, mistress, and mother of his nine children. An extraordinarily skilled draftsman, here he worked in tone rather than line, delicately drawing in chalk on a rough textured sheet and leaving the low points of the paper untouched to produce a stippled, hazy effect.

    Collection text · The Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0
LOOK ACROSS THE WORKS

Compare materials, style and colour

The 1862 portrait describes an older sitter; Medea turns the figure toward myth and material richness; the 1871 chalk drawing uses black, brown and red to build another kind of presence. Compare skin, hair and accessories across oil and dry drawing materials. A narrow date span supports focused comparison, not a complete biography in pictures.

Material

What can this material do? Distinguish a design, an original object and a later impression or cast.

Style

Compare viewpoint, edges, composition and marks. Which choices persist, and which change?

Colour

Compare palette, contrast and light. Consider the support, printing, surface treatment and ageing.

Sources and further reading

Original educational interpretation; catalogue descriptions are separately credited. Each study links to its source. Reference entries without images are not added to the comparison timeline.

Browse all artist guides ↗

Find your next discovery.